Transgenic Maize Event MON 87419 and Methods of Use Thereof

ABSTRACT

The invention provides recombinant DNA molecules that are unique to the maize MON 87419 event and transgenic maize plants, plant parts, seeds, cells, and agricultural products containing the MON 87419 event as well as methods of using and detecting the maize MON 87419 event. Transgenic maize plants containing the MON 87419 event exhibit tolerance to dicamba and glufosinate herbicides.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No.61/968,342, filed Mar. 20, 2014, herein incorporated by reference in itsentirety.

INCORPORATION OF SEQUENCE LISTING

The sequence listing that is contained in the file named“MONS362US.txt”, which is 29.4 KB (measured in MS-Windows) and createdon Mar. 9, 2015, is filed herewith and incorporated herein by referencein its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to recombinant DNA molecules that are unique tothe transgenic maize event MON 87419. The invention also relates totransgenic maize plants, parts, seeds, cells, and agricultural productscontaining the maize MON 87419 event as well as methods of using thesame. Transgenic maize plants containing the maize MON 87419 eventexhibit tolerance to dicamba and glufosinate herbicides.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Maize (Zea mays) is an important crop in many areas of the world. Themethods of biotechnology have been applied to this crop in order toproduce maize with desirable traits. One such desirable trait isherbicide tolerance. Expression of a heterologous gene, also known as atransgene, for herbicide tolerance in a plant can confer herbicidetolerance on the plant. However, the expression of a transgene, andtherefore its effectiveness, may be influenced by many different factorsincluding the orientation and composition of the cassette drivingexpression of the individual transgene transferred to the plantchromosome and the chromosomal location and the genomic result of thetransgene insertion. This is complicated further in transgenic plantswith multiple molecularly-linked transgenes, each conferring a separatetrait. In such a situation, proper expression of each of themolecularly-linked transgenes in the plant must result from the sametransgene insertion (also called a multi-gene event). In such cases, itis necessary to design and test multiple expression cassettes, each witha different configuration of transgenes and expression elements, andthen to produce and analyze a large number of individual planttransformation events through multiple generations of plants in order toselect the transgenic event having superior properties relative to theeach of the desirable traits and the optimal phenotypic and agriculturalcharacteristics necessary to make it suitable for commercial purposes.Such selection requires extensive molecular characterization as well asgreenhouse and field trials over multiple years, in multiple locations,and under a variety of conditions so that a significant amount ofagronomic, phenotypic, and molecular data may be collected. Theresulting data and observations must then be analyzed by teams ofscientists and agronomists with the goal of selecting the event suitablefor commercial agricultural use across a wide range of germplasm and ina variety of field conditions. Once selected, the commercial eventconferring the desirable traits may be introgressed into other geneticbackgrounds using plant breeding methods, thus producing a number ofdifferent crop varieties that contain the desirable trait and aresuitably adapted to specific local growing conditions.

To make a transgenic plant containing a single transformation event, aportion of a recombinant DNA construct is transferred into the genome ofa maize cell using plant transformation techniques. This maize cell issubsequently used to produce a unique R₀ plant, which can then be usedto produce transgenic progeny plants. The genome of the progeny plantscontains the unique event, and these plants can be tested for thedesired trait(s) as well as for agronomic performance. The effectivenessof an event can be impacted by cis and/or trans factors relative to theintegration site in the transformation event. The phenotype conferred bythe event can also be impacted by the size and design of the DNAconstruct, which can vary by the combination of genetic elements in anexpression cassette, number of transgenes, number of expressioncassettes, and configuration of such elements and such cassettes. Theperformance of a given event can be further complicated by factors suchas plant developmental, diurnal, temporal, or spatial patterns oftransgene expression; or by extrinsic factors, for example,environmental plant growth conditions, water availability, nitrogenavailability, heat, or stress. Thus, the ability to create an eventconferring a desirable set of phenotypic traits is not readilypredictable.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides a recombinant DNA molecule containing a sequenceselected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:1-10. The invention alsoprovides a recombinant DNA derived from a transgenic maize plant or seedcontaining the maize MON 87419 event, a representative sample of seedcomprising the maize MON 87419 event having been deposited as ATCCAccession No. PTA-120860. The invention also provides a recombinant DNAmolecule that is an amplicon diagnostic for the presence of DNA derivedfrom the maize MON 87419 event. The invention also provides a DNAmolecule that is in a maize plant, cell, seed, progeny plant, or plantpart derived from transgenic maize comprising the maize MON 87419 event.

The invention provides a DNA molecule having sufficient length ofcontiguous DNA sequence of SEQ ID NO:10 to function as a DNA probe thathybridizes under stringent hybridization conditions with a DNA moleculecomprising a DNA sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ IDNO:1-10 and does not hybridize under the stringent hybridizationconditions with a DNA molecule not comprising a DNA sequence selectedfrom the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:1-10. The invention also providesa pair of DNA molecules comprising a first DNA molecule and a second DNAmolecule, wherein the first DNA molecule is a fragment of SEQ ID NO:9and the second DNA molecule is a fragment of the maize genomic DNA ofthe maize MON 87419 event, and wherein the first and second DNAmolecules each comprise a DNA sequence of sufficient length ofcontiguous nucleotides to function as DNA primers when used together inan amplification reaction with DNA containing the maize MON 87419 eventto produce an amplicon diagnostic for the maize MON 87419 event in asample.

The invention provides a method of detecting the presence of the maizeMON 87419 event in a sample of DNA by contacting the sample with a DNAprobe, subjecting the sample and the DNA probe to stringenthybridization conditions, and detecting hybridization of the DNA probeto a DNA molecule in the sample, where the hybridization of the DNAprobe to the DNA molecule indicates the presence of the maize MON 87419event in the sample of DNA.

The invention provides a method of detecting the presence of the maizeMON 87419 event in a sample of DNA by contacting the sample with a pairof DNA primers, performing an amplification reaction sufficient toproduce a DNA amplicon comprising a sequence selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NO:1-8 and SEQ ID NO:10, and detecting the presenceof the DNA amplicon in the reaction, wherein the presence of the DNAamplicon in the reaction indicates the presence of the maize MON 87419event in the sample of DNA.

The invention provides a DNA detection kit containing at least one DNAmolecule comprising a DNA sequence of sufficient length of contiguousnucleotides of SEQ ID NO:10 to function as a primer or probe specificfor detecting the presence of the maize MON 87419 event in a sample ofDNA.

The invention provides a recombinant maize plant, seed, cell, plantpart, or commodity product comprising a DNA molecule having a DNAsequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:1-10. Theinvention also provides a transgenic maize plant, seed, or cell that istolerant to glufosinate or dicamba, or glufosinate and dicambaherbicides. The invention also provides a transgenic maize plant, seed,cell, plant part, or commodity product containing the maize MON 87419event. The invention also provides a transgenic maize plant or seed thatis a hybrid having at least one parent plant that comprised the maizeMON 87419 event.

The invention provides a method for controlling weeds in an areacomprising planting transgenic maize comprising the maize MON 87419event in an area and applying an effective dose of dicamba orglufosinate or dicamba and glufosinate herbicides to control the weedsin the area without injuring the transgenic maize. The invention alsoprovides a method for controlling weeds by applying an effective dose ofglufosinate herbicide of about 0.1 pounds acid equivalent per acre toabout 16 pounds acid equivalent per acre of glufosinate herbicide over agrowing season. The invention also provides a method for controllingweeds by applying an effective dose of glufosinate herbicide of about0.4 pounds acid equivalent per acre to about 1.59 pounds acid equivalentper acre of glufosinate herbicide over a growing season. The inventionalso provides a method for controlling weeds by applying an effectivedose of dicamba herbicide of about 0.1 pounds acid equivalent per acreto about 16 pounds acid equivalent per acre of dicamba herbicide over agrowing season. The invention also provides a method for controllingweeds by applying an effective dose of dicamba herbicide is about 0.5pounds acid equivalent per acre to about 2 pounds acid equivalent peracre of dicamba herbicide over a growing season.

The invention provides a method of producing a transgenic maize plantthat is tolerant to glufosinate and dicamba herbicides by sexuallycrossing a transgenic maize plant comprising the maize MON 87419 eventwith a second maize plant, collecting the seed produced, growing theseed to produce progeny plants, treating the progeny plants withglufosinate or dicamba, or glufosinate and dicamba herbicides, andselecting a progeny plant that is tolerant to glufosinate and dicambaherbicides. The invention also provides a method of producing atransgenic maize plant that is tolerant to glufosinate and dicambaherbicides by selfing a transgenic maize plant comprising the maize MON87419 event, collecting the seed produced, growing the seed to produceprogeny plants, treating the progeny plants with glufosinate or dicamba,or dicamba and glufosinate herbicides, and selecting a progeny plantthat is tolerant to glufosinate and dicamba herbicides.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1: illustrates the organization of the transgene insert in thegenome of a maize plant comprising maize event MON 87419. The horizontallines correspond to the relative positions of SEQ ID NO:1, SEQ ID NO:2,SEQ ID NO:3, SEQ ID NO:4, SEQ ID NO:5, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:7, SEQ IDNO:8, SEQ ID NO:9, SEQ ID NO:10; the thick arrows labeled SQ26644 andSQ26645 represent the approximate position of a pair of primers used toidentify transgenic maize containing the maize MON 87419 event; thethick, short lines numbered 14 through 22 represent the relativeposition of unique recombinant construct sequences within the DNA insert(SEQ ID NO:9) and the number refers to the corresponding SEQ ID NO ofeach, respectively; the thin horizontal arrows represent the relativeorganization of the two separate expression cassettes of theheterologous transgene inserted DNA of the maize MON 87419 event and theboxes indicate the separate elements of the two expression cassettes; aleading ‘P’ represents a promoter element, a leading ‘L’ represents aleader element, a leading ‘I’ represents an intron, a leading ‘TS’represents a chloroplast transit peptide, a leading ‘T’ represents a 3′transcription termination and polyadenylation element (3′ UTR), patrepresents the coding region for the phosphinothricin acetyl transferase(PAT) protein, and dmo represents the coding region for the dicambamono-oxygenase (DMO) protein.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEQUENCES

SEQ ID NO:1 is a thirty nucleotide DNA sequence representing the 5′junction of maize genomic DNA and the transgene insert. SEQ ID NO:1corresponds to nucleotide positions 1232 to 1261 of SEQ ID NO:10.

SEQ ID NO:2 is a thirty nucleotide DNA sequence representing the 3′junction of maize genomic DNA and the transgene insert. SEQ ID NO:2corresponds to nucleotide positions 7994 to 8023 of SEQ ID NO:10.

SEQ ID NO:3 is a sixty nucleotide DNA sequence representing the 5′junction of maize genomic DNA and the transgene insert. SEQ ID NO:3corresponds to nucleotide positions 1217 to 1276 of SEQ ID NO:10.

SEQ ID NO:4 is a sixty nucleotide DNA sequence representing the 3′junction of maize genomic DNA and the transgene insert. SEQ ID NO:4corresponds to nucleotide positions 7979 to 8038 of SEQ ID NO:10.

SEQ ID NO:5 is a one-hundred nucleotide DNA sequence representing the 5′junction of maize genomic DNA and the transgene insert. SEQ ID NO:5corresponds to nucleotide positions 1197 to 1296 of SEQ ID NO:10.

SEQ ID NO:6 is a one-hundred nucleotide DNA sequence representing the 3′junction of maize genomic DNA and the transgene insert. SEQ ID NO:6corresponds to nucleotide positions 7959 to 8058 of SEQ ID NO:10.

SEQ ID NO:7 is a 1771 nucleotide DNA sequence representing 1246nucleotides of the 5′ flanking maize genomic DNA and 525 nucleotides ofthe 5′ end of the transgene insert.

SEQ ID NO:8 is a 1767 nucleotide DNA sequence representing 516nucleotides of the 3′ end of the transgene insert and 1251 nucleotidesof the 3′ flanking maize genomic DNA.

SEQ ID NO:9 is a 6762 nucleotide DNA sequence corresponding to thetransgene insert of the maize MON 87419 event.

SEQ ID NO:10 is a 9259 nucleotide DNA sequence corresponding to themaize MON 87419 event; the sequence contains the 5′ flanking genomic DNAsequence from positions 1 to 1246, the transgenic DNA insert frompositions 1247 to 8008, and the 3′ flanking genomic DNA sequence frompositions 8009 to 9259.

SEQ ID NO:11 is a 33 nucleotide DNA sequence corresponding to a primerreferred to as SQ26644 and used to identify maize MON 87419 event DNA ina sample; it corresponds to positions 7966 to 7998 of SEQ ID NO:10.

SEQ ID NO:12 is a 24 nucleotide DNA sequence corresponding to a primerreferred to as SQ26645 and used to identify maize MON 87419 event DNA ina sample; it corresponds to positions 8022 to 8045 of SEQ ID NO:10.

SEQ ID NO:13 is a 19 nucleotide DNA sequence corresponding to a probereferred to as PB11207 and used to identify maize MON 87419 event DNA ina sample; it corresponds to positions 8002 to 8020 of SEQ ID NO:10.

SEQ ID NOs:14-22 are DNA sequences corresponding to unique sequenceswithin the transgene insert of the maize MON 87419 event.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The following definitions and methods are provided to better define theinvention and to guide those of ordinary skill in the art in thepractice of the invention. Unless otherwise noted, terms are to beunderstood according to conventional usage by those of ordinary skill inthe relevant art.

Modern plant transformation techniques are used to generate geneticallyengineered plants. The term ‘transgenic’ may also be used to refer togenetically engineered plants. During the process of generating atransgenic plant, foreign DNA is randomly inserted into the genome of aplant cell. During the transformation procedure, many individual cellsare transformed. Due to random integration, a separate and unique DNArecombination event will take place within the genome of each individualtransformed plant cell. An entire transgenic plant is then generatedfrom a single individual transgenic cell which necessarily results inevery cell of the transgenic plant containing the uniquely inserted DNAas a stable part of its genome. The transgenic herbicide tolerant maizecontaining the maize MON 87419 event comprises a single insertion oftransgenic DNA into the chromosome/genome of the maize germplasm. Themaize MON 87419 event was produced by: (i) transformation of thousandsof maize plant cells with a nucleic acid construct that includes thetransgenes of interest, (ii) regeneration of a population of maizeplants each containing a unique transgenic event, and (iii) multi-yeartesting, screening, and selection to select an event having thedesirable agronomic properties, the maize MON 87419 event. The maize MON87419 event is characterized by the unique DNA sequence of the insertionof the transgene into the particular location of the maize plant'sgenome.

The act of inserting the transgenic DNA into the genome of the maizeplant is accomplished by the act of plant transformation and results inthe creation of a new transgenic genomic molecular sequence, known as an“event”. This sequence is unique to and specific for the event and canbe readily identified when compared to the original maize genomicsequence or other transgenic maize events. Molecular analysis of themaize MON 87419 event identified the genomic insertion site of theinserted DNA (SEQ ID NO:9) and the flanking maize genomic DNA sequenceimmediately adjacent to either side of the inserted DNA (SEQ ID NO:7 andSEQ ID NO:8). This arrangement of the inserted DNA in relation to thesurrounding maize plant genome DNA is therefore specific and unique tothe transgenic herbicide tolerant maize comprising the maize MON 87419event. This new genomic molecular sequence (SEQ ID NO:10) is also anintegral part of the chromosome of transgenic herbicide tolerant maizeplants comprising the maize MON 87419 event and as such is static in theplant and may be passed on to progeny of the plant.

The present invention also provides progeny of the original transformantcomprising the maize MON 87419 event. Such progeny may be produced byselfing of a maize plant comprising the maize MON 87419 event or bysexual outcross between a maize plant comprising the maize MON 87419event and another plant that does or does not contain the maize MON87419 event. Such other plant may be a transgenic plant comprising thesame or different event(s) or a nontransgenic plant, such as one from adifferent variety. Even after repeated back-crossing to a recurrentparent, the maize MON 87419 event from the transformed parent is presentin the progeny of the cross at the same genomic location.

As used herein, the term “maize” means Zea mays (also referred to ascorn) and includes all plant varieties that can be bred with maize.

The invention provides a transgenic herbicide tolerant maize plantcontaining the maize MON 87419 event that is tolerant to dicamba(3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid) herbicide and glufosinate(2-amino-4-(hydroxymethylphosphinyl) butanoic acid) herbicide. Dicambais a synthetic auxin herbicide useful for controlling broadleaf weeds.Glufosinate is an organophosporus herbicide useful for controlling abroad spectrum of annual and perennial grass and broadleaf weeds. Themaize MON 87419 event contains a demethylase (dmo) gene fromStenotrophomonas maltophilia that expresses a dicamba mono-oxygenase(DMO) protein to confer tolerance to dicamba herbicide and a bialaphosresistance (pat) gene from Streptomyces viridochromogenes that expressesthe phosphinothricin N-acetyltransferase (PAT) protein to confertolerance to glufosinate herbicide.

As used herein, the term “recombinant” refers to a non-natural DNA,protein, or organism that would not normally be found in nature and wascreated by human intervention. As used herein, a “recombinant DNAmolecule” is a DNA molecule comprising a combination of DNA moleculesthat would not naturally occur together and is the result of humanintervention, for example, a DNA molecule that is comprised of acombination of at least two DNA molecules heterologous to each other,such as a DNA molecule that comprises a transgene and the plant genomicDNA adjacent to the transgene. An example of a recombinant DNA moleculeis a DNA molecule comprising at least one sequence selected from SEQ IDNO:1-10. As used herein, a “recombinant plant” is a plant that would notnormally exist in nature, is the result of human intervention, andcontains a transgenic DNA molecule. As a result of such genomicalteration, the recombinant plant is something new and distinctlydifferent from the related wild-type plant. An example of a recombinantplant is a maize plant containing the maize MON 87419 event.

As used herein, the term “transgene” refers to a DNA moleculeartificially incorporated into an organism's genome as a result of humanintervention, such as by plant transformation methods. A transgene maybe heterologous to the organism. The term “transgene insert” as usedherein refers to the transgene inserted by plant transformationtechniques into the maize genome to produce maize event MON 87419. Thesequence for this transgene insert is provided as SEQ ID NO:9. The term“transgenic” refers to comprising a transgene, for example a “transgenicplant” refers to a plant comprising a transgene.

As used herein, the term “heterologous” refers to a first molecule notnormally associated with a second molecule or an organism in nature. Forexample, a DNA molecule may be derived from a first species and insertedinto the genome of a second species. The DNA molecule would thus beheterologous to the genome and the organism.

As used herein, the term “chimeric” refers to a single DNA moleculeproduced by fusing a first DNA molecule to a second DNA molecule, whereneither first nor second DNA molecule would normally be found in thatconfiguration fused to the other. The chimeric DNA molecule is thus anew DNA molecule not normally found in nature. An example of a chimericDNA molecule is a DNA molecule comprising at least one sequence selectedfrom SEQ ID NO:1-10.

The invention provides DNA molecules and their corresponding DNAsequences. As used herein, the terms “DNA” and “DNA molecule” refer to adeoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) molecule. A DNA molecule may be of genomicor synthetic origin, and is by convention from the 5′ (upstream) end tothe 3′ (downstream) end. As used herein, the term “DNA sequence” refersto the nucleotide sequence of a DNA molecule. The nomenclature used isthat required by Title 37 of the United States Code of FederalRegulations § 1.822 and set forth in the tables in WIPO Standard ST.25(1998), Appendix 2, Tables 1 and 3. By convention, the DNA sequences ofthe invention and fragments thereof are disclosed with reference to onlyone strand of the two complementary DNA sequence strands. By implicationand intent, the complementary sequences of the sequences provided here(the sequences of the complementary strand), also referred to in the artas the reverse complementary sequences, are within the scope of theinvention and are expressly intended to be within the scope of thesubject matter claimed. Thus, as used herein references to SEQ IDNO:1-10 and SEQ ID NO:14-22 and fragments thereof include and refer tothe sequence of the complementary strand and fragments thereof.

As used herein, the term “fragment” refers to a smaller piece of awhole. For example, fragments of SEQ ID NO:10 would include sequencesthat are at least about 20 consecutive nucleotides, at least about 25consecutive nucleotides, at least about 30 consecutive nucleotides, atleast about 35 consecutive nucleotides, at least about 40 consecutivenucleotides, at least about 45 consecutive nucleotides, at least about50 consecutive nucleotides, at least about 60 consecutive nucleotides,at least about 70 consecutive nucleotides, at least about 80 consecutivenucleotides, at least about 90 consecutive nucleotides, or at leastabout 100 consecutive nucleotides of the complete sequence of SEQ IDNO:10.

The DNA sequence corresponding to the complete DNA sequence of thetransgene insert and substantial segments of the maize genome DNAflanking either end of the transgene insert is provided as SEQ ID NO:10.The DNA sequences of the maize genomic DNA physically linked byphosphodiester bond linkage to and therefore flanking the 5′ end of thetransgene insert is provided as SEQ ID NO:1, SEQ ID NO:3, SEQ ID NO:5,and SEQ ID NO:7. The DNA sequence of the maize genomic DNA physicallylinked by phosphodiester bond linkage to and therefore flanking the 3′end of the transgene insert is provided as SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ ID NO:4, SEQID NO:6, and SEQ ID NO:8.

Transgenic maize containing the maize MON 87419 event comprises tworegions referred to as junctions. A “junction” is where one end of thetransgene insert has been connected to the genomic DNA. A junction spansor extends across a portion of the transgene insert and the adjacentflanking genomic DNA and as such is the connection point of these two asone contiguous molecule. One junction is at the 5′ end of the transgeneinsert and one is at the 3′ end of the transgene insert, referred toherein as the 5′ and 3′ junction, respectively. A “junction sequence”refers to a DNA sequence of any length that spans the 5′ or 3′ junctionof an event. Junction sequences of the maize MON 87419 event are readilyapparent to one of skill in the art using SEQ ID NO:10. Examples ofjunction sequences of the maize MON 87419 event are provided as SEQ IDNO:1-8. FIG. 1 illustrates the physical arrangement of SEQ ID NO:1-10arranged from 5′ to 3′. The invention thus provides a DNA molecule thatcontains at least one of the DNA sequences as set forth in SEQ IDNO:1-8.

The junction sequences of the maize MON 87419 event may be present aspart of the genome of a transgenic maize plant, seed, or cell containingthe maize MON 87419 event. The identification of any one or more of SEQID NO:1-8 in a sample derived from a transgenic maize plant, plant part,seed, or cell indicates that the DNA was obtained from transgenic maizecontaining the maize MON 87419 event and is diagnostic for the presenceof the maize MON 87419 event.

The maize MON 87419 event contains sequences which are unique to thetransgene insert, specifically SEQ ID NO:14-22. These sequences areunique to the specific chimeric configuration of the various promoters,introns, chloroplast targeting peptides (CTP), 3′ termination signal,the pat and dmo genes within the transgene insert of the event. FIG. 1illustrates the relative position of each of these unique transgeneinsert sequences with respect to SEQ ID NO:9.

Provided are exemplary DNA molecules that can be used either as primersor probes for diagnosing the presence in a sample of DNA derived fromthe maize MON 87419 event. Such primers or probes are specific for atarget nucleic acid sequence and as such are useful for theidentification of the maize MON 87419 event by the methods describedhere.

A “primer” is a DNA molecule that is designed for use in annealing orhybridization methods that involve an amplification reaction. Anamplification reaction is an in vitro reaction that amplifies templateDNA to produce an amplicon. As used herein, an “amplicon” is a DNAmolecule that has been synthesized using amplification techniques.Amplicons of the invention have a DNA sequence comprising one or more ofSEQ ID NO:1-10, or fragments thereof. A pair of primers may be used withtemplate DNA, such as a sample of maize genomic DNA, in an amplificationreaction, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), to produce anamplicon, where the amplicon produced would have a DNA sequencecorresponding to sequence of the template DNA located between the twosites where the primers hybridized to the template. A primer istypically designed to hybridize to a complementary target DNA strand toform a hybrid between the primer and the target DNA strand. The presenceof a primer is a point of recognition by a polymerase to begin extensionof the primer using as a template the target DNA strand. Primer pairsrefer to use of two primers binding opposite strands of a doublestranded nucleotide segment for the purpose of amplifying the nucleotidesegment between them. Examples of primer sequences are provided as SEQID NO:11 and SEQ ID NO:12. The primer pair provided as SEQ ID NO:11 andSEQ ID NO:12 are useful as a first DNA molecule and a second DNAmolecule, where the first DNA molecule is a fragment of SEQ ID NO:9 andthe second DNA molecule is a fragment of the maize genomic DNA sequenceof SEQ ID NO:10, and each are of sufficient length to function as DNAprimers when used together in an amplification reaction with DNAcontaining the maize MON 87419 event to produce an amplicon diagnosticfor the maize MON 87419 event in a sample. The maize genomic DNAsequence of the maize MON 87419 event is provide as positions 1-1246 and8009-9259 of SEQ ID NO:10.

A “probe” is a nucleic acid molecule that is complementary to a strandof a target nucleic acid and useful in hybridization detection methods.Probes according to the invention include not only deoxyribonucleic orribonucleic acids but also polyamides and other probe materials thatbind specifically to a target DNA sequence and the detection of suchbinding can be useful in detecting the presence or absence of the targetDNA sequence. A probe may be attached to a conventional detectable labelor reporter molecule, such as a radioactive isotope, ligand,chemiluminescent agent, or enzyme. An exemplary DNA sequence useful as aprobe for detecting maize MON 87419 event is provided as SEQ ID NO:13.

Methods for designing and using primers and probes are well known in theart, and DNA molecules comprising fragments of SEQ ID NO:1-10 and usefulas primers and probes for detecting the maize MON 87419 event canreadily be designed by one of skill in the art.

The DNA molecules and corresponding DNA sequences provided herein aretherefore useful for identifying the maize MON 87419 event in transgenicmaize plants, cells, seeds, or parts; selecting maize varieties orhybrids comprising the maize MON 87419 event; and detecting the presenceor absence of the maize MON 87419 event in a sample.

As used herein, the term “isolated” refers to separating a molecule fromother molecules normally associated with it in its native or naturalstate. The term “isolated” thus may refer to a DNA molecule that hasbeen separated from other DNA molecule(s) which normally are associatedwith it in its native or natural state. Such a DNA molecule may bepresent in a recombined state, such as a recombinant DNA molecule. Thus,DNA molecules fused to regulatory or coding sequences with which theyare not normally associated, for example as the result of recombinanttechniques, are considered isolated, even when integrated as a transgeneinto the chromosome of a cell or present with other DNA molecules.

The invention provides maize plants, progeny, seeds, plant cells, andplant parts containing the maize MON 87419 event, and commodity productsproduced using these. A representative sample of transgenic herbicidetolerant maize seed comprising MON 87419 event has been depositedaccording to the Budapest Treaty with the American Type CultureCollection (ATCC®). The ATCC repository has assigned the Patent DepositDesignation PTA-120860 to the seed of the transgenic herbicide tolerantmaize plant containing the maize MON 87419 event. The plants, progeny,seeds, plant cells, plant parts, and commodity products of the inventioncontain a detectable amount of DNA having at least one of the sequencesprovided as SEQ ID NO:1-10 and SEQ ID NO:14-22. Plants, progeny, seeds,plant cells, and plant parts of the invention may also contain one ormore additional transgenic traits, particularly those introduced bycrossing a maize plant containing the maize MON 87419 event with anotherplant containing the additional transgenic trait(s). Such traits includebut are not limited to increased insect resistance, increased water useefficiency, increased yield performance, increased drought resistance,increased seed quality, improved nutritional quality, hybrid seedproduction, and/or increased herbicide tolerance, in which the trait ismeasured with respect to a maize plant lacking such transgenic trait.

Plants of the invention may be used to produce progeny that contain themaize MON 87419 event. As used herein, “progeny” includes any plant,seed, and plant cell comprising the maize MON 87419 event inherited froman ancestor plant, indicated by the plant comprising a DNA moleculehaving at least one sequence selected from SEQ ID NO:1-10. Plants,progeny, and seeds may be homozygous or heterozygous for the maize MON87419 event. Progeny plants may be grown from seeds produced by a maizeplant containing the maize MON 87419 event or from seeds produced by amaize plant fertilized with pollen containing the maize MON 87419 event.

As used herein, a “plant part” of the invention is any part derived froma transgenic maize plant containing the maize MON 87419 event. Plantparts include but are not limited to pollen, ovule, pod, flower, roots,stems, fibers, and leaves. Plant parts may be viable or nonviable.

The invention provides a commodity product that is produced fromtransgenic maize containing the maize MON 87419 event. Commodityproducts of the invention contain a detectable amount of DNA comprisinga DNA sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:1-10. Asused herein, a “commodity product” refers to any composition or productwhich is comprised of material derived from a transgenic maize plant,maize seed, maize plant cell, or maize plant part containing the maizeMON 87419 event. Commodity products include but are not limited toprocessed seeds, grains, plant parts, and meal. Transgenic maizecontaining the maize MON 87419 event can be used to manufacture anycommodity product typically acquired from maize. A commodity product ofthe invention will contain a detectable amount of DNA corresponding tothe maize MON 87419 event. Detection of one or more of this DNA in asample may be used for determining the content or the source of thecommodity product. Any standard method of detection for DNA moleculesmay be used, including methods of detection disclosed herein.

The invention provides methods for controlling weeds using glufosinateor dicamba, or glufosinate and dicamba herbicides with transgenic maizecontaining the maize MON 87419 event. A method for controlling weeds inan area, such as a field, is provided that consists of plantingtransgenic maize plants containing the maize MON 87419 event in an areaand applying an herbicidally effective dose of glufosinate or dicamba,or glufosinate and dicamba herbicides to the area for the purpose ofcontrolling weeds in the area without injuring the transgenic maizeplants containing the maize MON 87419 event. Such application ofglufosinate or dicamba, or glufosinate and dicamba herbicides may bepre-emergence (any time after transgenic maize seed containing the maizeMON 87419 event is planted and before transgenic maize plants containingthe maize MON 87419 event emerge) or post-emergence (any time aftertransgenic maize plants containing the maize MON 87419 event emerge). Aherbicidally effective dose of glufosinate for use in the area forcontrolling weeds should consist of a range from about 0.1 pound acidequivalent per acre (ae/ac) to as much as about 16 pounds ae/ac ofglufosinate over a growing season. A herbicidally effective dose ofdicamba for use in the area for controlling weeds should consist of arange from about 0.1 pound ae/ac to as much as about 16 pounds ae/ac ofdicamba over a growing season. Multiple applications of glufosinate ordicamba, or glufosinate and dicamba herbicides may be used over agrowing season, for example, two applications (such as a pre-plantingapplication and a post-emergence application or a pre-emergenceapplication and a post-emergence application) or three applications(such as a pre-planting application, a pre-emergence application, and apost-emergence application).

As used herein, the “active ingredient” or “ai” is the component of anherbicide formulation responsible for the herbicidal activity, oftenmeasured in pounds per gallon or applied as pounds per acre. Forherbicides that are acids (for example, molecules that have a carboxylgroup as part of their structure), the acidic group is often convertedto (may be replaced by the desired ions to form) a salt or (reacted withan alcohol to form) an ester during the formulation process. This mayalter not only the chemical characteristics of a particular herbicidemolecule, but also the mass. However, the corresponding acid is theherbicidally active portion of the formulation and equivalency ofherbicidal activity between different active ingredients can becalculated using the acid equivalent as the standard unit ofmeasurement. The term “acid equivalent” or “ae” means the portion of anactive ingredient in a formulation that theoretically could be convertedback to the corresponding acid. Herbicide application rates may beexpressed as “acid equivalent per acre” (abbreviated as “ae/ac”) or as“active ingredient per acre” (abbreviated as “ai/ac”).

Methods for producing an herbicide tolerant transgenic maize plantcontaining the maize MON 87419 event are provided. Progeny produced bythese methods may be varietal or hybrid plants; may be grown from seedsproduced by a transgenic maize plant containing the maize MON 87419event or from seeds produced by a maize plant fertilized with pollenfrom a transgenic maize plant containing the maize MON 87419 event; andmay be homozygous or heterozygous for the maize MON 87419 event. Plantsmay be self-pollinated (also known as “selfing”) or cross-pollinated(also known as “crossing”). Transgenic maize plants containing the maizeMON 87419 event may be self-pollinated to generate a true breeding lineof plants that are homozygous for the maize MON 87419 event. Selfingresults in progeny known as “inbred” and is used to produce inbred linesthat are genetically uniform. Alternatively, transgenic maize plantscontaining the maize MON 87419 event may be outcrossed (bred withanother plant that is transgenic or nontransgenic) to produce a varietalor a hybrid seed. Seed and progeny plants made by the methods of theinvention would contain the maize MON 87419 event and may then betreated with glufosinate or dicamba, or glufosinate and dicambaherbicides. Treatment with glufosinate or dicamba, or glufosinate anddicamba herbicides may be used to select progeny that are tolerant.Alternatively, these progeny plants may be analyzed using diagnosticmethods to select for plants or seeds containing the maize MON 87419event.

Plants, progeny, seeds, plant cells, and plant parts of the inventionmay also contain one or more additional maize transgenic traits,particularly those introduced by crossing a maize plant containing themaize MON 87419 event with another maize plant containing the additionaltransgenic trait(s). Such maize transgenic traits include, but are notlimited to, increased insect resistance, increased water use efficiency,increased yield performance, increased drought resistance, increasedseed quality, improved nutritional quality, hybrid seed production, andherbicide tolerance, in which the trait is measured with respect to amaize plant lacking such transgenic trait. Such maize transgenic traitsare known to one of skill in the art; for example, a list of such traitsis provided the United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Animaland Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) and can be found on theirwebsite at http://www.aphis.usda.gov. Two transgenic plants may thus becrossed to produce progeny that contain two or more independentlysegregating transgenic traits. Back-crossing to a parental plant andout-crossing with a non-transgenic plant are also contemplated, as isvegetative propagation. Descriptions of breeding methods that arecommonly used for different traits and crops can be found in one ofseveral references, for example, Fehr, in Breeding Methods for CultivarDevelopment, Wilcox J. ed., American Society of Agronomy, Madison Wis.(1987).

The plants, seeds, cells, plant parts, and commodity products of theinvention may be used for detection of DNA and protein moleculesindicative of the presence of the maize MON 87419 event. Such detectionwould be done using the DNA sequences provided herein and the respectiveDMO and PAT protein sequences encoded by the transgene insert that isprovided as SEQ ID NO:9. Detection of the presence of the maize MON87419 event may be done by using methods known in the art, such asthermal amplification of nucleic acid, nucleic acid hybridizationtechniques (such as northern blotting and southern analysis), proteindetection techniques (such as western blotting, immuno-precipitation,and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based (ELISA) techniques) or byusing the methods of detection and/or the detection kits providedherein. One method provides for contacting a DNA sample with a primerpair that is capable of producing an amplicon from DNA of the transgenicmaize containing the maize MON 87419 event, performing an amplificationreaction and thereby producing a DNA amplicon comprising at least one ofthe DNA sequences provided as SEQ ID NO:1-10 and SEQ ID NO:14-22, andthen detecting the presence or absence of the amplicon molecule andoptionally confirming within the sequence of the amplicon a sequencecomprising at least one of the sequences provided as SEQ ID NO:1-10 andSEQ ID NO:14-22. The presence of such an amplicon is diagnostic for thepresence of DNA specific for the transgenic maize containing the maizeMON 87419 event and thus biological material in the sample that isderived from transgenic maize containing the maize MON 87419 event.Another method provides for contacting a DNA sample with a DNA probe,subjecting the probe and the DNA sample to stringent hybridizationconditions, and then detecting hybridization between the probe and thetarget DNA sample. Detection of hybridization is diagnostic for thepresence of DNA specific for the transgenic maize containing the maizeMON 87419 event in the DNA sample.

DNA detection kits for the maize MON 87419 event are provided.Variations on such kits can also be developed using the compositions andmethods disclosed herein and the methods well known in the art of DNAdetection. DNA detection kits can be applied to methods for breedingwith transgenic maize plants containing the maize MON 87419 event. Suchkits contain DNA primers or probes comprising fragments of SEQ IDNO:1-10. One example of such a kit comprises at least one DNA moleculeof sufficient length of contiguous nucleotides of SEQ ID NO:10 tofunction as a DNA probe useful for detecting the presence and/or absencein a sample of DNA derived from transgenic herbicide tolerant maizeplants containing the maize MON 87419 event. A DNA molecule sufficientfor use as a DNA probe is provided that is useful for determining,detecting, or diagnosing the presence and/or absence in a sample oftransgenic herbicide tolerant maize containing the maize MON 87419 eventDNA is provided as SEQ ID NO:13. Other probes may be readily designed byone of skill in the art and should comprise at least about fifteennucleotides of SEQ ID NO:10 and be sufficiently unique to transgenicherbicide tolerant maize containing the maize MON 87419 event DNA inorder to identify DNA derived from the maize MON 87419 event. Anothertype of kit comprises a primer pair useful for producing an ampliconuseful for detecting the presence or absence in a sample of the maizeMON 87419 event. Such a kit would employ a method comprising contactinga target DNA sample with a primer pair, then performing a nucleic acidamplification reaction sufficient to produce an amplicon comprising aDNA molecule having at least one sequence selected from SEQ ID NO:1-10,and then detecting the presence or absence of the amplicon. Such amethod may also include sequencing the amplicon or a fragment thereof.Other primer pairs may be readily designed by one of skill in the artand should comprise at least twenty nucleotides of SEQ ID NO:10 and besufficiently unique to the transgenic herbicide tolerant maizecontaining the maize MON 87419 event DNA in order to detect the maizeMON 87419 event. Kits of the invention may optionally also comprisereagents for performing the detection or diagnostic reactions describedherein or instructions for the use of the kit and its contents.

As used herein, the term “comprising” means “including but not limitedto”.

Deposit Information

A deposit of a representative sample of transgenic maize seed comprisingthe maize MON 87419 event has been made according to the Budapest Treatywith the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) having an address at10801 University Boulevard, Manassas, Va. USA, Zip Code 20110. The ATCCPatent Deposit Designation (accession number) for seeds comprising themaize MON 87419 event is PTA-120860 and the date of deposit was Jan. 17,2014. The deposit will be maintained in the depository for a period of30 years, or 5 years after the last request, or for the effective lifeof the patent, whichever is longer.

EXAMPLES

The following examples are included to more fully describe theinvention. It should be appreciated by those of skill in the art thatmany modifications can be made in the specific examples which aredisclosed and still obtain a similar result. Certain agents which areboth chemically and physiologically related may be substituted for theagents described herein while achieving the same or similar results. Allsuch substitutions and modifications apparent to those skilled in theart are deemed to be within the scope of the invention.

Example 1: MON 87419 Event Production and Selection

This example describes the production, analysis, and selection oftransgenic maize containing the event MON 87419, an event which canprovide tolerance to both dicamba and glufosinate herbicides. Summarizedare the production and analysis of tens of thousands of individualplants over multiple years through the rigorous molecular, phenotypic,and field testing required for the ultimate selection of the maize MON87419 event.

Transformation vectors containing a variety of different expressioncassettes were designed and tested to confirm their utility forexpressing the dmo and pat genes. Using this data, expression elementcombinations were selected and eight different transformation vectorswere constructed and transformed into maize. These vectors testedpromoters and terminators in various combinations with the two codingregions for the pat gene and the dmo gene (Table 1). The resultingplants were analyzed for protein expression and two vectors (shown as Aand B in Table 1) were selected for commercial maize transformation.

TABLE 1 Cassette Configuration of Transformation Vectors. cassette 1(PAT) cassette 2 (DMO) Gene of Gene of Vector Promoter InterestTerminator Promoter Interest Terminator A AND.ge.Ubq1 PAT Os.Ara5PCSV/I-Act1 CTP4/DMO Hsp17.5 B P-1 PAT T-1 PCSV/I-Act1 CTP4/DMO Hsp17.5C AND.ge.Ubq1 PAT Os.Ara5 P-1 CTP4/DMO Hsp17.5 D P-1 PAT T-1 AND.ge.Ubq1CTP4/DMO Hsp17.5 E AND.ge.Ubq1 PAT Os.Ara5 P-2 CTP4/DMO Hsp17.5 FAND.ge.Ubq1 PAT Os.Ara5 P-3 CTP4/DMO Hsp17.5 G P-1 PAT T-1 P-2 CTP4/DMOHsp17.5 H P-1 PAT T-1 P-3 CTP4/DMO Hsp17.5

Over thirteen thousand unique transformed maize plants were producedusing the two vectors (A and B) that were selected. In plants there isoften wide variation in the levels of expression of an introduced geneamong individual events, and gene expression can directly correlatepositively or negatively with the phenotype of the plant containing theevent. The expression of foreign genes in plants is known to beinfluenced, among other things, by their chromosomal position. For thisreason, it was necessary to screen a large number of individual plantscontaining random insertion events through multiple years and locationsto identify the optimal event. The transgenic maize MON 87419 event wascreated through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of LH244 maizeimmature embryos. Methods for transforming maize are known in the art.Maize cells were transformed and regenerated into intact maize plants.Rooted plants with normal phenotypic characteristics were selected.Thousands of individual, independent events were then transferred tosoil for growth and further assessment.

TABLE 2 Event Selection Process Vector A Vector B Total Unique EventsEvents Events Milestone Advanced Advanced Advanced R0 EvaluationTransgenic Events 5236 8413 13649 Produced First Pass Single 1300 16982998 Copy analysis R0 Spray 642 798 1440 Initial Detailed 85 99 184Molecular Analysis R0 Southern 54 58 112 Early Screens (R1 & R2) R1Trials & 22 22 44 molecular analysis R2 Trials & 20 22 42 molecularanalysis Advanced Field Trials & SA Year 1 7 10 17 Molecular Analysis USYear 1 5 6 11 SA Year 2 2 3 5 In-depth evaluation 2 0 2 Final eventselection 1 0 1

Throughout the event selection process, molecular analysis as well asfield trials to assess phenotype, agronomics, and efficacy of the eventswere conducted, often concurrently (Table 2). The 13,000 individual,unique transformed maize R0 plants were analyzed first by PCR to selectfor events with a single copy of the transgene insert (First Pass SingleCopy). This resulted in the advancement of 2,998 events. The nextselection was R0 herbicide spray tolerance conducted in a green house.The plants were tested for tolerance to both glufosinate (Ignite® 280herbicide) and dicamba (Clarity® herbicide) by using a tank mix ofglufosinate (0.9 lb ai/ac) and dicamba (2.0 lb ae/ac) sprayed at theV1/V2 growth stage. Plants that showed >15% injury were discarded, and1,440 events were selected for further analysis. An initial detailedmolecular analysis was conducted and included sequence identificationand confirmation, and a second check of copy number and absence ofbackbone. This analysis resulted in 184 events containing only a singlecopy of the transgene insert selected for advancement. Southern analysison DNA extracted from R0 events was done to further confirm transgeneinsert copy number and to confirm absence of transformation backbone.Based on this, 112 events were selected for advancement to R1 forfurther analysis. R0 plants were self-pollinated and seed was collectedfor R1 trials.

Concurrently with all field trials, additional molecular analysis was inprogress. Northern analysis was done to detect and measure mRNAtranscripts of the pat and dmo genes. N-terminal protein sequencing ofthe PAT and DMO proteins purified from transgenic plants containingselect events was done to confirm the recombinant protein sequence.Western analysis to detect the PAT and DMO proteins was done withtransgenic plant samples. Sequencing of the entire transgene and boththe 5′ and 3′ ends of the insert was conducted and subsequently used todevelop methods of detecting individual events. In depth Southernanalysis was performed on R1 plants to confirm copy number and theabsence of backbone.

For the R1 field trial early screens, of the 112 events selected fromthe R0 screening 82 events were selected based on seed return andnursery size considerations. The R1 plants were segregating, and thuswere null, hemizygous, or homozygous for an event. The 82 events in R1plants were evaluated in a field efficacy screen with high rates ofherbicide application. Plant injury was assessed following treatmentswith various combinations of glufosinate (Ignite 280) and dicamba(Clarity) (up to 20× glufosinate and up to 16× dicamba labeled fieldapplication rates) and with application timing at various growth stagesfrom V1/V2 to V8/V10. Injury ratings were taken 10 to 14 days afterherbicide application. Standard injury ratings include scoring forpercent chlorosis, malformation, and breeding. Overall averages formultiple plants containing the same event were used to select events foradvancement. Herbicide applications at 2× rates generally produced lessthan 10% injury, and herbicide application at the 16× and 20× ratesproduced injury ratings of more than 10%. In addition to the efficacytesting, agronomic scoring was collected for each plant and correlatedto the event it contained. The agronomic scoring criteria that wereevaluated included plant height, ear height, percent moisture, testweight, days to 50% pollen, and days to 50% silk. Based on analysis ofthe data collected from the R1 field trials and the molecular analysis,44 events were selected for advancement to R2 for further analysis. R1plants were self-pollinated and seed was collected for R2 trials.

In the R2 field trial early screens, R2 and F1 events (from an R1outcross) were evaluated in field efficacy screens at three locations(two states and Puerto Rico). Plant injury was assessed followingtreatments with various combinations of glufosinate and dicambaapplication rates and application timing. The R2 plants are homozygousfor the event, and the herbicide tolerance failure rate after herbicideapplication was low, confirming the R1 results. Agronomic data wascollected and scored as in the R1 field trials. Additional molecularanalysis, including gene expression analysis, was also used to selectplants containing the best events. Based on analysis of the datacollected from the R2 and F1 field trials and the molecular analysis, 42events were selected for advancement to R3 for further analysis. R2plants were self-pollinated and seed was collected for R3 trials.

For the advanced field trials, both hybrid and inbred efficacy andhybrid and inbred agronomic field trials were conducted. The agronomicfield trials were run during the same season as the efficacy fieldtrials. All field trials used a randomized complete block design andwere conducted at multiple locations. For both efficacy and agronomicfield trials, agronomic scoring was collected throughout the field trialseason, and at the end of the season yield was determined (efficacyyield or agronomic yield). Efficacy field trials were conducted toassess crop injury 10 to 14 days following herbicide application, cropinjury ratings, and yield. The target crop injury rating was a score ofless than 10% for advancement of the event. For agronomic field trials,the plots were maintained weed free and no glufosinate or dicambaherbicide was applied during the growing season. The hybrid agronomicfield trials included controls of a comparable hybrid (hybrid control)produced using the same parental maize lines used to make the transgenichybrid cross, but not containing a transgenic event. Inbred controlswere a comparable inbred to the transgenic inbred lines.

A meta-analysis was performed using the aggregate of the multi-season,multi-location field trial data. Table 3 illustrates the number ofreplications for which an observation was repeated for the particularfield trial type for plants containing either one of the events. Foreach of the two events, there were 135 data points recorded for hybridagronomic performance, 933 data points for hybrid efficacy, 179 datapoints for inbred agronomics, 30 data points for inbred efficacy, and 16data points for event based pressure testing of herbicide applicationrates for maize containing the event.

TABLE 3 Field trial replications for two final events. Description Repsper event Hybrid Agronomics 135 reps Hybrid Efficacy 933 reps InbredAgronomics 179 reps Inbred Efficacy 30 reps Event based Pressure Test 16reps Total Replications per event 1293

Hybrid plants each containing one of 23 selected events (a subset of the42 events from the R2 field trial) were evaluated in South America (SA)Year 1 contra-season efficacy field trials and agronomic field trials.Trials were conducted at six locations in a randomized complete blockdesign with 4 treatments and 2 replications per treatment. In theefficacy field trials, the dicamba formulation was Banvel® 4SL herbicideand the glufosinate formulation was Liberty® 1.67SL. Herbicidetreatments consisted of the following: (1) non-treated control; (2)dicamba at 2 lbs ae/acre (ac) PRE (where PRE is defined as at plantingor before crop emergence) followed by dicamba at 1 lb ae/ac applied ateach of VE-V2 followed by V4 followed by V8; (3) glufosinate applied at0.8 lb ai/ac at VE-V2 followed by V4 followed by V8; and (4) glufosinateapplied at 0.8 lb ai/ac plus dicamba applied at 1 lb ae/ac at VE-V2followed by V4 followed by V8. Injury ratings were taken at 10 to 14days after herbicide application. Overall averages for multiple plantscontaining the same event were used to select events for advancement.The target crop injury rating was a score of less than 10%, and theobserved injury rating was below 1%. Based upon hybrid injury scoring,agronomic scoring, efficacy yield, agronomic yield, and additionalmolecular analysis, 17 events were selected for advancement.

Inbred and hybrid plants from the 17 events advanced from the SA Year 1contra-season field trials were then further evaluated in United States(US) Year 1 efficacy field trials and agronomic field trials. Thesetrials were conducted in 2012, which was a season of severe drought inthe United States. The hybrid efficacy field trials were conducted at 12locations, 2 states in a randomized complete block design with 6treatments and 3 replications per treatment. The hybrid plantscontaining the transgenic event derived glyphosate tolerance from themale parent in the cross. In these efficacy field trials, the glyphosateformulation was Roundup PowerMAX® 4.5SL, the dicamba formulation wasClarity 4SL, and the glufosinate formulation was Ignite 280 2.34SL.Herbicide treatments consisted of the following: (1) non-treatedcontrol; (2) glyphosate at 3 lbs ae/ac applied at V4 followed by V8; (3)glufosinate at 0.8 lb ai/ac applied at V2 followed by V4 followed by V8;(4) dicamba at 2 lbs ae/ac applied PRE and then again applied at V4followed by V8; (5) glyphosate at 3 lbs ae/ac plus dicamba at 1.5 lbsae/ac applied at V2 followed by V4 followed by V8; (6) dicamba at 2 lbsae/ac applied at V2 followed by glufosinate at 0.8 lbs ai/ac plusdicamba at 1 lb ae/ac applied at growth stage V4 followed by glyphosateat 3 lbs ae/ac plus dicamba at 1.5 lbs ae/ac applied at growth stage V8.Injury ratings were taken 10 to 14 days after herbicide application.Overall averages for multiple plants containing the same event were usedto select events for advancement. The target crop injury rating was ascore of less than 10%, and the observed injury rating was below 1%.Based on hybrid injury scoring, agronomic scoring, efficacy yield,agronomic yield, and additional molecular analysis, 11 events wereselected for advancement.

South America (SA) Year 2 contra-season field trials to assess hybridefficacy and inbred agronomic yield were then conducted with plantscontaining these 11 events. The hybrid plants containing the transgenicevent derived glyphosate tolerance from the male parent in the cross.The hybrid efficacy field trials were conducted essentially as describedfor South America (SA) year 1 contra-season field trials but with thefollowing herbicide treatments: (1) non-treated control; (2) glyphosateat 3 lbs ae/ac applied at V4 followed by V8; (3) glufosinate at 0.8 lbai/ac applied at V4 followed by V8; (4) dicamba at 2 lbs ae/ac appliedPRE and then again applied at V4 followed by V8; (5) glyphosate at 3 lbsae/ac plus dicamba at 1.5 lbs ae/ac applied at V4 followed by V8; (6)glufosinate at 0.8 lbs ai/ac plus dicamba at 1 lb ae/ac applied at V4followed by glyphosate at 3 lbs ae/ac plus dicamba at 1.5 lbs ae/acapplied at V8. Injury ratings were taken 10 to 14 days after herbicideapplication. Overall averages for multiple plants containing the sameevent were used to select events for advancement. Based on hybrid injuryscoring, agronomic scoring, hybrid efficacy yield, inbred agronomicyield, and additional molecular analysis, 5 events were selected foradvancement.

Additional molecular analysis was then completed for these 5 events. Themulti-year field and molecular data for each of the 5 events, includinghybrid trait efficacy field trials, hybrid and inbred yieldmeasurements, agronomic scoring, and molecular information was thenreviewed, and two events were selected for further analysis. Both ofthese events were produced using the same transformation vector, andtherefore had the same transgene insert but not the same genomiclocation or flanking sequence.

United States (US) Year 2 hybrid and inbred efficacy field trials, andhybrid and inbred agronomic field trials were conducted to evaluatethese two events. The hybrid efficacy trials were done similar to year 1US field trials, but included different spray regimens. Efficacy wasmeasured by injury ratings and hybrid efficacy yield. Additionalmolecular analysis for the events was also done. The hybrid plantscontaining the transgenic event derived glyphosate tolerance from themale parent in the cross. The hybrid Efficacy 1 and 2 field trials wereconducted at twelve locations across two states and the hybrid Efficacy3 field trials were conducted at thirty-three locations across fourstates. In these field trials, the glyphosate formulation was RoundupPowerMAX 4.5SL, the dicamba formulation was Clarity 4SL, and theglufosinate formulation was Ignite 280 2.34SL. Herbicide applicationsfor the Efficacy 1 and Efficacy 2 trials (with crosses to two separateinbred lines) were: (1) non-treated control; (2) glufosinate at 0.4 lbai/ac applied at VE-V2 followed by V6; (3) glufosinate at 0.8 lb ai/acapplied at VE-V2 followed by V6; (4) dicamba at 0.5 lbs ae/ac applied atV4 followed by V8; (5) dicamba at 1.0 lbs ae/ac applied at V4 followedby V8; and (6) glyphosate at 2.25 lbs ae/ac plus dicamba at 1.0 lbsae/ac applied at V4 followed by V8. Herbicide applications for theEfficacy 3 trial (representing hybrid from a cross with a third inbredline) were: (1) non-treated control; (2) dicamba at 0.5 lbs ae/acapplied at VE-V2 followed by glufosinate at 0.4 lb ai/ac applied at V6;and (3) dicamba at 1.0 lbs ae/ac applied at VE-V2 followed byglufosinate at 0.8 lb ai/ac applied at V6. Injury ratings were taken 10to 14 days after herbicide application and for multiple plantscontaining the same event were used to select events for advancements.Yield and agronomic data was collected.

To compare the hybrid injury ratings for the two events, meta-analysisof the multiple hybrid efficacy field trials was completed. (Table 4)Injury rating was scored at V8 (where V8 analysis encompasses thecumulative injury from V2, V4, V6, and V8 herbicide applications) with astatistical least significant difference (LSD at p<0.05). Tester 1,Tester 2, and Tester 3 represent crosses with 3 independent inbred maizeparent lines, which were used to generate the hybrid for the indicatedfield trial. For each of the trials, no statistical difference in injuryrating was found between hybrids generated using a transgenic maizeparent containing either of the two events.

TABLE 4 Meta-analysis of injury rating from hybrid efficacy fieldtrials. Transgenic V8 LSD Field Trial Maize injury (P < 0.05) Year 1combined SA and US MON 87419 0.43 0.3 Year 1 combined SA and US EVENT 20.49 0.3 SA Year 2 Hybrid Efficacy MON 87419 2.58 3 SA Year 2 HybridEfficacy EVENT 2 1.98 3 US Year 2 Hybrid Tester 1 MON 87419 0 0 US Year2 Hybrid Tester 1 EVENT 2 0 0 US Year 2 Hybrid Tester 2 MON 87419 0 0 USYear 2 Hybrid Tester 2 EVENT 2 0 0 US Year 2 Hybrid Tester 3 MON 874190.31 0.42 US Year 2 Hybrid Tester 3 EVENT 2 0.12 0.42

A meta-analysis of the hybrid efficacy yield (bushels/acre) from themultiple efficacy field trials was completed comparing yield fromhybrids containing each of the two events. (Table 5) For each of thetrials, no statistical difference in hybrid efficacy yield was foundbetween hybrids generated using a transgenic maize parent containingeither of the two events.

TABLE 5 Meta-analysis of yield from hybrid efficacy field trials. YieldLSD Field Trial Hybrid Maize (Bu/ac) (p < 0.05) Year 1 combined SA andUS MON 87419 171.07 4 Year 1 combined SA and US EVENT 2 172.90 4 SA Year2 MON 87419 233.66 14 SA Year 2 EVENT 2 231.59 14 US Year 2 Tester 1 MON87419 217.43 10 US Year 2 Tester 1 EVENT 2 220.06 10 US Year 2 Tester 2MON 87419 219.68 7 US Year 2 Tester 2 EVENT 2 221.21 7 US Year 2 Tester3 MON 87419 208.76 5.67 US Year 2 Tester 3 EVENT 2 213.02 5.67

Pressure testing field trials were also conducted with hybrid transgenicmaize containing either one of the two events. In the pressure tests,either glufosinate (Ignite 280, 2.34SL) or dicamba (Clarity 4SL)herbicide was applied at non-commercially high rates. For typical fieldtrials, the 1× rate for glufosinate was 0.4 lb ai/ac and the 1× rate fordicamba was 0.5 lb ae/ac. For the glufosinate pressure testing fieldtrials, glufosinate was applied at VE-V2 followed by V4 followed by V8at the following rates: (1) 1 lb ai/ac (2.5×); (2) 2 lb ai/ac (5×); (3)4 lb ai/ac (10×); and (4) 8 lb ai/ac (20×). For the dicamba pressuretesting field trials, dicamba was applied at VE-V2 followed by V4followed by V8 at the following rates: (1) 2 lb ae/ac (4×); (2) 4 lbae/ac (8×); (3) 8 lb ae/ac (16×); and (4) 16 lb ae/ac (32×). At the endof the season, the hybrid pressure testing field trials were harvestedand yield (bushels/acre or bu/ac) was determined. An analysis of theyield data compared hybrids containing either of the two events. Foreach of the trials, no statistical difference in yield at any of theherbicide application rates was found between hybrids generated using atransgenic maize parent containing either of the two events.

TABLE 6 Yield from hybrid pressure testing efficacy field trials.Transgenic Yield LSD Field Trial Hybrid Maize (Bu/ac) (p < 0.05)Glufosinate Pressure Test 2.5-20X MON 87419 207.31 40 GlufosinatePressure Test 2.5-20X EVENT 2 201.65 40 Dicamba Pressure Test 4-32X MON87419 239.93 40 Dicamba Pressure Test 4-32X EVENT 2 234.60 40

Hybrid agronomic field trials were conducted in 3 sets with 15 locationsper set at 21 locations across 3 states and were run during the sameseason with the hybrid efficacy field trials. Agronomic measures werecollected through out the field trial season, and at the end of theseason agronomic yield was determined. Meta-analysis across themulti-season, multi-location hybrid agronomic field trials was used tocompare the yield of the hybrid control and the hybrids containing theeither one of the two events. No statistical difference in hybridagronomic yield was found either between the transgenic hybrids or ascompared to the hybrid controls (Table 7).

TABLE 7 Meta-analysis of yield from hybrid agronomic field trials. YieldLSD Field Trial Hybrid Maize (Bu/ac) (p < 0.05) Year 1 combined SA andUS Control 180.28 6 Year 1 combined SA and US MON 87419 179.01 6 Year 1combined SA and US EVENT 2 184.88 6 SA Year 2 Control 231.70 10 SA Year2 MON 87419 232.47 10 SA Year 2 EVENT 2 225.07 10 US Year 2 Tester 1Control 185.80 17.40 US Year 2 Tester 1 MON 87419 187.09 17.40 US Year 2Tester 1 EVENT 2 192.28 17.40 US Year 2 Tester 2 Control 219.12 12.83 USYear 2 Tester 2 MON 87419 219.56 12.83 US Year 2 Tester 2 EVENT 2 221.2212.83 US Year 2 Tester 3 Control 197.62 8.66 US Year 2 Tester 3 MON87419 191.49 8.66 US Year 2 Tester 3 EVENT 2 195.48 8.66

Inbred efficacy field trials were conducted using a randomized completeblock design at 6 locations, 1 state. In these field trials, the dicambaformulation was Clarity 4SL, and the glufosinate formulation was Ignite280 2.34SL. The herbicide application for the inbred efficacy fieldtrials were glufosinate at 0.8 lb ai/ac and dicamba at 2.0 lbs ae/acapplied at VE-V2 followed by glufosinate at 0.8 lb ai/ac and dicamba at2.0 lbs ae/ac applied at V8. At the end of the season, yield wasmeasured. For each of the trials, a statistical difference in inbredefficacy yield was found when comparing inbred yield harvested fromthese trials from transgenic maize containing either of the two events(Table 8). These data indicate the superior performance of transgenicmaize containing the maize MON 87419 event.

TABLE 8 Meta-analysis of yield from inbred efficacy field trials. LSDField Trial Inbred Maize Yield (Bu/ac) (p < 0.05) year 2 US Inbred MON87419 110.95 7 year 2 US Inbred EVENT 2 98.89 7

Inbred agronomic field trials were run during the same season with theUS Year 1 efficacy field trials, SA Year 1 efficacy field trials, and USYear 2 efficacy field trials (11 locations, 1 state). The plots were setup in randomized complete block design conducted at multiple locations,and the trials included controls of a comparable inbred to thetransgenic inbred lines. Meta-analysis across the multi-season,multi-location inbred agronomic field trials was conducted comparingyield for the paired control and the transgenic inbreds generated usingeither of the two events. No statistical difference in inbred agronomicyield was found between the control and transgenic maize containing theMON 87419 event (Table 9). In contrast, there was a statisticallysignificant decrease in yield in transgenic maize containing the event 2when compared to either control or transgenic maize containing the MON87419 event. These data further indicated the superior performance oftransgenic maize containing the maize MON 87419 event.

TABLE 9 Meta-analysis of yield from inbred agronomic field trials. LSDField Trial Inbred Maize Total (Bu/ac) (p < 0.05) year 1 US InbredControl 65.87 31 year 1 US Inbred MON 87419 60.33 31 year 1 US InbredEVENT 2 43.10 31 year 2 SA Inbred Control 95.88 7 year 2 SA Inbred MON87419 98.77 7 year 2 SA Inbred EVENT 2 75.85 7 year 2 US Inbred Control108.90 6 year 2 US Inbred MON 87419 109.22 6 year 2 US Inbred EVENT 296.88 6

Example 2: Characterization of the DNA Sequence of the Maize MON 87419Event

This example describes the extensive molecular characterization that wasconducted on the maize MON 87419 event. The transgene insert of themaize MON 87419 event contains, from the 5′ to 3′ orientation: (i) thepromoter (P-ANDge.Ubq1), leader, and intron (L-I-ANDge.Ubq1) of theubiquitin gene (Ubq) from Andropogon gerardii; operably linked to thepat gene from Streptomyces viridochromogenes (CR-STRvi.pat) that encodesa phosphinothricin N-acetyltransferase (PAT) that confers tolerance toglufosinate herbicide; operably linked to the polyadenylation signal(also known as a terminator that directs polyadenylation of mRNA) fromthe RA5B precursor gene of Oryza sativa (T-Os.Ara5) and (ii) thepromoter for the full length transcript of Peanut Chlorotic Streak Viruswith a duplicated enhancer region (PC1SV); operably linked to the leaderof the light harvesting complex b1 gene from Triticum aestivum(L-Ta.Lhcb1); operably linked to the first intron from the actin 1 genefrom Oryza sativa (I-Os.Act1); operably linked to the N-terminalchloroplast transit peptide from the Petunia x hybrida5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase gene (TS-Ph.ShkG-CTP4);operably linked to the dmo gene Stenotrophomonas maltophilia optimizedfor monocot expression(CR-STEma.DMO) that encodes a dicambamonooxygenase (DMO) that confers tolerance to dicamba herbicide;operably linked to the heat shock protein 17 polyadenylation signal fromTriticum aestivum (T-Ta.Hsp17). The 5′ end of the transgene insert wasflanked by the Right border of Agrobacterium tumifaciens and the 3′ endof the transgene insert was flanked by the Left border of Agrobacteriumtumifaciens.

Southern blot analysis was conducted to confirm that transgenic maizecontaining the maize MON 87419 event contained a single, intact copy ofthe entire transgene insert without any vector backbone. Flank sequenceswere isolated from both the 5′ and 3′ ends of the insert, and therespective junctions were determined using inverse PCR and/or genomewalking techniques. The chromosomal location of the insert of the maizeMON 87419 event was determined using inverse PCR to amplify genomic DNAoutside of the site of interest. The flank sequences for the maize MON87419 event were mapped to the known maize genome physical assembly andthe maize MON 87419 event was confirmed to not be within any knowngenes. This sequence information was used to design event specificendpoint TAQMAN® assays to identify the presence of the maize MON 87419event in a sample. The insertion site sequence information was also usedfor bioinformatics analysis of the chromosomal location of the event.Insertion site integrity was determined by PCR across the wild-typeallele using primers specific to the flanking regions of the maize MON87419 event. The wild-type insertion site was used to map to the maizereference genome the unique site of transgene integration for the maizeMON 87419 event. To ensure that no alterations or mutations wereintroduced to any region of the transgene during transformation, theentire transgene insert of the maize MON 87419 even was isolated fromthe plant and sequenced.

N-terminal protein sequencing of the expressed PAT and DMO proteins wasperformed using immunopurified protein extracts from transgenic maizegrain containing the maize MON 87419 event. This sequence was then usedto confirm the authentic N-terminal amino acid sequence. Westernanalysis was conducted on protein extracts from grain of transgenicmaize containing the maize MON 87419 event. This confirmed that a singleexpected-sized protein was being produced for PAT and for DMO,respectively. ELISAs were developed to determine protein levels invarious transgenic maize tissue types (leaf, seed, roots, and pollen)for the PAT or DMO protein expressed from the maize MON 87419 event.Northern analysis was conducted on poly-A RNA isolated from grain oftransgenic maize containing the maize MON 87419 event. This confirmedthe transcript size and number for the pat and dmo mRNA products. RNAexpression levels were also measured by real-time PCR using samples fromtransgenic maize containing the maize MON 87419 event.

Example 3: Event Specific Endpoint TAQMAN® Assays

This example describes an event specific endpoint TAQMAN® thermalamplification method developed to identify transgenic maize containingthe maize MON 87419 event in a sample. The DNA primers used in theendpoint assay are primers SQ26644 (SEQ ID NO:11), SQ26645 (SEQ IDNO:12), and 6-FAM™ labeled probe PB11207 (SEQ ID NO:13). 6-FAM™ is afluorescent dye product of Applied Biosystems (Foster City, Calif.)attached to the DNA probe. For TAQMAN® MGB™ probes, the 5′ exonucleaseactivity of Taq DNA polymerase cleaves the probe from the 5′-end,between the fluorophore and quencher. When hybridized to the target DNAstrand, quencher and fluorophore are separated enough to produce afluorescent signal, thus releasing fluorescence. SQ26644 and SQ26645when used with these reaction methods and PB11207 produce a DNA ampliconthat is diagnostic for the maize MON 87419 event. The controls for thisanalysis should include a positive control containing the maize MON87419 event, a negative control from non-transgenic maize, and anegative control that contains no template DNA. Additionally, a controlfor the PCR reaction should optimally include Internal Control Primersand an Internal Control Probe, specific to a single copy gene in themaize genome. These assays are optimized for use with either an AppliedBiosystems GeneAmp® PCR System 9700 (run at maximum speed) or MJResearch DNA Engine PTC-225 thermal cycler, but other equipment may beused.

An example of conditions useful with Endpoint TAQMAN® assay methoduseful for detection of the maize MON 87419 event is as follows. Step 1:18 megohm water adjusted for final volume of 10 μl. Step 2: 5.0 μl of 2×Universal Master Mix (dNTPs, enzyme, buffer) to a 1× finalconcentration. Step 3: 0.5 μl Event Primer-1 (SQ26644) and EventPrimer-2 (SQ26645). Mix (resuspended in 18 megohm water to aconcentration of 20 uM for each primer) to 1.0 μM final concentration(for example in a microcentrifuge tube, the following should be added toachieve 500 μl at a final concentration of 20 uM: 100 μl of PrimerSQ26644 at a concentration of 100 μM; 100 μl of Primer SQ26645 at aconcentration of 100 μM; 300 μl of 18 megohm water). Step 4: 0.2 μlEvent 6-FAM™ MGB Probe PB11207 (10 uM) (resuspended in 18 megohm waterto a concentration of 10 μM to 0.2 μM final concentration. Step 5: 0.5μl Internal Control Primer-1 and Internal Control Primer-2 Mix(resuspended in 18 megohm water to a concentration of 20 μM for eachprimer) to 1.0 μM final concentration. Step 6: 0.2 μl Internal ControlVIC™ Probe (10 uM) to 0.2 μM final concentration (resuspended in 18megohm water to a concentration of 10 μM). Step 7: 3.0 μl Extracted DNA(template) for each sample with one each of the following comprising 1.Leaf Samples to be analyzed; 2. Negative control (non-transgenic DNA);3. Negative water control (no template); 4. Positive control transgenicmaize containing the maize MON 87419 event DNA. Step 8: ThermocyclerConditions as follows: One Cycle at 50° C. for 2 minutes; One Cycle at95° C. for 10 minutes; Ten Cycles of 95° C. for 15 seconds then 64° C.for 1 minute with (−1° C./cycle); Thirty Cycles of 95° C. for 15 secondsthen 54° C. 1 minute, optional additional 10 to 20 cycles (95° C. for 15seconds then 64° C. for 1 minute (−1° C./cycle) may provide moredistinct population separation during EndPoint TaqMan® analysis); finalcycle of 10° C.

Example 4: Zygosity Assay

A zygosity assay may be used to determine whether or not a plantcomprising the maize MON 87419 event is heterozygous or homozygous forthe event or the wild-type allele. An amplification reaction assay canbe designed using the sequence information provided herein. For example,such a PCR assay would include design of at least three primers:primer-1, primer-2, and primer-3, where primer-1 is specific to maizegenomic DNA on the 3′ flank of the maize MON 87419 event; primer-2 isspecific to the maize MON 87419 event transgene insert; and primer-3 isspecific to the wild-type allele. When used as a primer pair in anamplification reaction, primer-1 with primer-2 will produce a PCRamplicon specific for the maize MON 87419 event. When used as a primerpair in an amplification reaction, primer-1 with primer-3 will produce aPCR amplicon specific for wild-type allele. In a PCR reaction performedon maize genomic DNA, the respective PCR amplicons generated from(primer-1+primer-2) and (primer-1+primer-3) will differ in sequence andsize of the amplicon. When the three primers are included in a PCRreaction with DNA extracted from a plant homozygous for the maize MON87419 event, only the primer-1+primer-2 amplicon will be generated. Whenthe three primers are included in a PCR reaction with DNA extracted froma plant heterozygous for the maize MON 87419 event, both theprimer-1+primer-2 amplicon and the primer-1+primer-3 amplicon will begenerated. When the three primers are mixed together in a PCR reactionwith DNA extracted from a plant that is null for the maize MON 87419event (that is wild-type), only the primer-1+primer-3 amplicon will begenerated.

Another method to determine zygosity of a maize plant for the maize MON87419 event is an endpoint TAQMAN® thermal amplification reaction. Forthis type of assay, in addition to primers as described above, the assaywould include two fluorescently labeled probes. Probe-1 would bespecific for the maize MON 87419 event, and probe-2 would be specificfor a maize plant that is null for the maize MON 87419 event(wild-type), and where the two probes contain different fluorescentlabels, for example the 6-FAM™-label or VIC™-label. When used in anendpoint TAQMAN® thermal amplification reaction,primer-1+primer-2+probe-1 will produce a first fluorescent signalspecific for the maize MON 87419 event. When used in an endpoint TAQMAN®thermal amplification reaction, primer-1+primer-3+probe-2 will produce asecond fluorescent signal specific for wild-type maize. When the threeprimers and two probes are included in an endpoint TAQMAN® thermalamplification reaction with DNA extracted from a plant homozygous forthe maize MON 87419 event, only the first fluorescent signal (specificto primer-1+primer-2+probe-1) will be generated. When the three primersare included in an endpoint TAQMAN® thermal amplification reaction withDNA extracted from a plant heterozygous for the maize MON 87419 event,both the first fluorescent signal (specific toprimer-1+primer-2+probe-1) and the second fluorescent signal (specificto primer-1+primer-3+probe-2) will be generated. When the three primersare mixed together in an endpoint TAQMAN® thermal amplification reactionwith DNA extracted from a plant which is null for the maize MON 87419event (wild-type), only the second fluorescent signal (specific toprimer-1+primer-3+probe-2) will be generated.

Another method to determine zygosity of a plant for the maize MON 87419event would be Southern analysis. One of skill in art would understandhow to design Southern hybridization probe(s) specific for the maize MON87419 event and a second southern hybridization probe specific for amaize plant which is null for the maize MON 87419 event (wild-type).With Southern analysis, a signal detected only from the first Southernhybridization probe will be indicative of a plant homozygous for themaize MON 87419 event; a signal detected from both the first Southernhybridization probe and the second Southern hybridization probe will beindicative of a plant heterozygous for the maize MON 87419 event; and asignal detected only from the second Southern hybridization probe willbe indicative that the DNA was extracted from a plant that is null forthe maize MON 87419 event (wild-type).

1-9. (canceled)
 10. A transgenic maize plant, seed, cell, plant part, orcommodity product comprising a DNA molecule having a DNA sequenceselected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:1, SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ IDNO:3, SEQ ID NO:4, SEQ ID NO:5, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:7, SEQ ID NO:8,SEQ ID NO:9, and SEQ ID NO:10.
 11. The transgenic maize plant, seed, orcell of claim 10, wherein the plant, seed, or cell is tolerant toglufosinate or dicamba, or glufosinate and dicamba herbicides.
 12. Atransgenic maize plant, seed, cell, plant part, or commodity productcomprising the maize MON 87419 event, a representative sample of seedcomprising said event having been deposited as ATCC Accession No.PTA-120860.
 13. The transgenic maize plant or seed of claim 12, whereinthe maize plant or seed is a hybrid having at least one parent plantcomprising the maize MON 87419 event.
 14. A method for controlling weedsin an area comprising planting the transgenic maize plant of claim 12 inan area and applying an effective dose of dicamba or glufosinate, ordicamba and glufosinate herbicides to control the weeds in the areawithout injuring the transgenic maize.
 15. The method of claim 14,wherein the effective dose of glufosinate herbicide is a total of about0.1 pounds acid equivalent per acre to about 16 pounds acid equivalentper acre of glufosinate herbicide over a growing season.
 16. The methodof claim 14, wherein the effective dose of glufosinate herbicide is atotal of about 0.4 pounds acid equivalent per acre to about 1.59 poundsacid equivalent per acre of glufosinate herbicide over a growing season17. The method of claim 14, wherein the effective dose of dicambaherbicide is a total of about 0.1 pounds acid equivalent per acre toabout 16 pounds acid equivalent per acre of dicamba herbicide over agrowing season.
 18. The method of claim 14, wherein the effective doseof dicamba herbicide is a total of about 0.5 pounds acid equivalent peracre to about 2 pounds acid equivalent per acre of dicamba herbicideover a growing season.
 19. A method of producing a transgenic maizeplant that is tolerant to glufosinate and dicamba herbicides, the methodcomprising: a) sexually crossing the transgenic maize plant of claim 12with itself or a second maize plant; b) collecting the seed produced; c)growing the seed to produce progeny plants; d) treating the progenyplants with glufosinate or dicamba, or glufosinate and dicambaherbicides; and e) selecting a progeny plant that is tolerant toglufosinate and dicamba herbicides.
 20. A method of growing a transgenicmaize plant that is tolerant to glufosinate and dicamba herbicides, themethod comprising: i. planting the transgenic maize seed of claim 12;ii. allowing a plant to grow from said seed; and iii. treating the plantwith glufosinate or dicamba, or glufosinate and dicamba herbicides. 21.A method of producing a plant that tolerates application of glufosinateand dicamba herbicides, the method comprising: iv. providing a DNAconstruct comprising the transgene insert shown in FIG. 1; v.introducing the DNA construct into a maize plant cell; and vi.regenerating the maize plant cell to produce a maize plant such that theplant tolerates application of glufosinate and dicamba herbicides. 22.The method of claim 21, wherein the transgene insert comprises SEQ IDNO:9.
 23. The method of claim 21, wherein introduction of the DNAconstruct into the maize plant cell results in a sequence selected fromSEQ ID NO:1-8 and 10 as part of the genome of the maize cell.
 24. Amaize plant produced by the method of claim
 21. 25. A progeny plant,seed, or part of the maize plant of claim 24.